Friday, June 20, 2008
Lower Gas Prices NOW!!!!
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
The Courts and Guantanamo Bay
I wanted to share with you a brilliant piece by Newt Gingrich talking about the recent court decision regarding the detainees at
A Decision Which Cannot Be Allowed to Stand
Finally, there has been a lot of commentary about the Supreme Court's narrowly divided decision last Thursday (Boumediene v. Bush) to allow enemy combatants like those terrorists being held at Guantanamo Bay to challenge their detention in U.S. courts.
Let me be clear where I stand: This is among the most arrogantly irresponsible Supreme Court decisions in American history and it cannot go unanswered by the other two branches of government. It is an appalling dereliction of duty if the executive and legislative branches fail to explicitly and swiftly reassert their sole dominion over the national security policy of our country.
Congress and the President Need Not Acquiesce to a Tyrannical Court
There is significant precedent in American history for believing that the legislative and executive branches can act to restrict the reach of judicial decisions as well as force the judicial branch into changing its views when they are out of touch with the constitutional values, practices, and traditions of
President Thomas Jefferson and the Jeffersonians successfully fought back against the Federalists' use of the courts to impose their agenda over the will of the people. After the Federalists lost the election of 1800, but before the new Jeffersonian congressmen took office, the Federalists more than doubled the number of federal circuit judges (from seventeen to thirty-five) and packed them with loyal Federalists. The Jeffersonians reacted by simply eliminating all eighteen new federal circuit court judgeships.
President Abraham Lincoln refused to treat the Dred Scott decision, which both declared unconstitutional a federal law that had limited the extension of slavery and that blacks were not citizens under the Constitution, as legally binding on the executive branch. For example, his administration issued
And in June 1942, when German spies who had landed in the
The executive and legislative branches possess clear constitutional powers to check and balance decisions of the judicial branch. The Boumediene decision requires that the executive and legislative branches act to reestablish a constitutional balance among the three branches. I will be writing more about this subject in weeks to come.
Friday, June 6, 2008
Talk Radio
I am getting to the point that I can not listen to conservative talk radio to much any more! I believe that if Obama wins it is because, unlike the conservative media, the liberal media will get behind their candidate; whether they agree with all he stands for or not. If we lose I lay most of it at the feet of the of the conservative talking heads, the idea that we should just let John McCain take a blood bath in the fall with the hope that in four years we can take it back, or that in two years we can get the house or senate back, is beyond fantasy and is setting us up for damage that we will have to deal with for the next 15 years at least.